Owners of rental property who are not “real estate professionals??? and whose income is over $100,000 may have suspended passive activity losses. These owners should be aware of the treatment of these suspended losses if they are contemplating a 1031 exchange.

Passive Activities

Prior to 1986, a taxpayer could generally deduct losses in full from rental activities and trades or businesses regardless of his or her participation. This gave rise to significant numbers of tax shelters that allowed taxpayers to deduct non-economic losses against wages and investment income. The Tax Reform Act of 1986, added IRC § 469, which limits the taxpayer’s ability to deduct losses from businesses in which he or she does not materially participate and from rental activities.

In general, losses generated by passive activities can only be used to offset income generated by passive activities. The rental of real estate is considered a passive activity. There are some exceptions to the general rule including the following:

A. $25,000 Deduction: Rental real estate losses up to $25,000 may be deducted by an individual whose modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is less than $100,000. To qualify for this offset, the taxpayer must actively participate (make management decisions), own at least 10 percent and not be a limited partner. The $25,000 exception is phased out at the rate of 50 cents for every dollar of MAGI over $100,000. Therefore, when MAGI exceeds $150,000, the $25,000 offset is not allowed.

B. Real Estate Professionals: A real estate professional may be able to deduct all current rental real estate losses regardless of how high his MAGI might be. To deduct losses without limit, the taxpayer must spend more than half of his time in real property businesses and work more than 750 hours a year and materially participate (works on a regular, continuous and substantial basis in operations) in each separate rental real estate activity.

So what happens to the losses if the real estate owner is not a real estate professional and the $25,000 deduction is phased out? The real estate owner has suspended passive activity losses (“PALs???) that can be carried forward indefinitely until there is passive income or an entire disposition in a fully taxable transaction.

1031 Exchanges and Passive Activity Losses

If a real estate owner disposes of his entire interest in a passive activity to an unrelated person in a fully taxable transaction, he may offset any gain with all passive activity losses allocable to the activity, not limited by the PAL rules. A fully taxable transaction is one in which all realized gain is recognized.

If the owner has substantial PALs that would offset the bulk of his gain, then the owner would better off selling the property outright and not doing a 1031 exchange. If the owner, however, has a substantial unrealized gain, his best option would be to do a 1031 exchange, using the PALs to offset boot recognized in the exchange. Alternatively, the owner could exchange the property to defer the gain and continue to carryforward the PALs until they can be used.

How or when is boot recognized in an exchange? The two most common examples are cash received at the closing of the property being sold or cash received at the end of the exchange because the real estate owner purchased a less expensive property. An example illustrates how this would work. A real estate owner decides to sell his rental property for $500,000. He has a tax basis of $100,000 and $50,000 of suspended passive activity losses. If he simply sold the property outright, his $400,000 gain would be reduced by the $50,000 of PALs, leaving him with a $350,000 taxable gain. If he opted to do a 1031 exchange, he could arrange to receive $50,000 at the closing, exchange the rest and fully defer the gain. The $50,000 cash boot would be taxable, but it would be reduced by the $50,000 in PALs resulting in no gain being recognized.

Real estate owners with significant PALs should consult with their tax advisors before doing an exchange.